<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tale of Two Dollars</title>
	<link>http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2007/10/tale-of-two-dollars/</link>
	<description>Trading, Investing, Politics, Whatever</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2007/10/tale-of-two-dollars/#comment-76552</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2007/10/tale-of-two-dollars/#comment-76552</guid>
		<description>The Fed data site, &lt;a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2" rel="nofollow"&gt;FRED II&lt;/a&gt;, has everything you would need to adjust based on whatever you chose to use, although you might have to export the data into a spreadsheet and do it yourself.
 
Why would we want to talk about oil in terms of dollar strength vs. other currencies?  Isn't oil priced based on supply vs demand and geopolitical risk?  Seriously, even though the talking heads want to stress oil as a "weak dollar" play, there's a host of reasons for oil price speculation, and oil was $20/bbl not too many years ago, so I can't buy that dollar strength against other currencies is a primary mover of oil – or even a secondary mover.  Tertiary at best, IMO.  The dollar being worth half as much in exchange would have moved oil from $20 to $40, right?  So where's the other $80 of movement coming from?  This is the same issue that goldbugs have with gold, they need to remember that gold and oil are speculative issues and will move for a variety of reasons, even including simple "animal spirits."
 
The Fed changes the weights on their Trade-Weighted Dollar Index regularly, based on the latest trade numbers.  It's a dynamic index that always reflects trade weighting, see &lt;a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/H10/Weights/" rel="nofollow"&gt;the Fed's release on weighting for this data&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fed data site, <a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2" rel="nofollow">FRED II</a>, has everything you would need to adjust based on whatever you chose to use, although you might have to export the data into a spreadsheet and do it yourself.</p>
<p>Why would we want to talk about oil in terms of dollar strength vs. other currencies?  Isn&#8217;t oil priced based on supply vs demand and geopolitical risk?  Seriously, even though the talking heads want to stress oil as a &#8220;weak dollar&#8221; play, there&#8217;s a host of reasons for oil price speculation, and oil was $20/bbl not too many years ago, so I can&#8217;t buy that dollar strength against other currencies is a primary mover of oil – or even a secondary mover.  Tertiary at best, IMO.  The dollar being worth half as much in exchange would have moved oil from $20 to $40, right?  So where&#8217;s the other $80 of movement coming from?  This is the same issue that goldbugs have with gold, they need to remember that gold and oil are speculative issues and will move for a variety of reasons, even including simple &#8220;animal spirits.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Fed changes the weights on their Trade-Weighted Dollar Index regularly, based on the latest trade numbers.  It&#8217;s a dynamic index that always reflects trade weighting, see <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/H10/Weights/" rel="nofollow">the Fed&#8217;s release on weighting for this data</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2007/10/tale-of-two-dollars/#comment-76506</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2007/10/tale-of-two-dollars/#comment-76506</guid>
		<description>I very much like the trade weighted Fed index shown. Would be good to have the ability to normalize to fixed year dollars for inflation purposes. Interesting to use the St.Lou Fed Chart to multi-line chart this. 

That said, doesn't it make some sense to use the 'faulty' USDX in discussions about oil, which is priced in either Dollars or Euros (&#62;50% weighting) and/or against a basket of energy-intensive countries?  (EU, JAP, etc.) It does to me, at least prima facie. 

Second point: the trade-weighted index is great, but...raises questions. Is this a fixed index like USDX
against "current" major trade partners, or does it dynamically adjust season by season to account for changes in trading percentage over the years. I don't think our trade with China, for example, was that major a fraction in 1985. 



Thanks for your post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very much like the trade weighted Fed index shown. Would be good to have the ability to normalize to fixed year dollars for inflation purposes. Interesting to use the St.Lou Fed Chart to multi-line chart this. </p>
<p>That said, doesn&#8217;t it make some sense to use the &#8216;faulty&#8217; USDX in discussions about oil, which is priced in either Dollars or Euros (&gt;50% weighting) and/or against a basket of energy-intensive countries?  (EU, JAP, etc.) It does to me, at least prima facie. </p>
<p>Second point: the trade-weighted index is great, but&#8230;raises questions. Is this a fixed index like USDX<br />
against &#8220;current&#8221; major trade partners, or does it dynamically adjust season by season to account for changes in trading percentage over the years. I don&#8217;t think our trade with China, for example, was that major a fraction in 1985. </p>
<p>Thanks for your post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2007/10/tale-of-two-dollars/#comment-38581</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 23:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2007/10/tale-of-two-dollars/#comment-38581</guid>
		<description>@ David:  Double-check the top 5 non-USDX countries in terms of U.S. trade (about 30% of trade BTW); &lt;strong&gt;none&lt;/strong&gt; have a current dollar peg, incl. China, i.e., the Yuan is revaluing.  They're just doing it slowly so that the speculators don't benefit overly much.  Pull up 5-year charts at Yahoo! to see the lack of pegging.
 
FYI the gist of my argument is that the USDX is worthless for macro prediction, and a broader, trade-weighted index is needed for macro prediction.  While your comment is presenting an economic prediction (that I don't necessarily agree with), it actually bolsters my argument that the USDX is worthless in the predictive sphere of things, by your inclusion of some non-USDX countries in your reasoning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ David:  Double-check the top 5 non-USDX countries in terms of U.S. trade (about 30% of trade BTW); <strong>none</strong> have a current dollar peg, incl. China, i.e., the Yuan is revaluing.  They&#8217;re just doing it slowly so that the speculators don&#8217;t benefit overly much.  Pull up 5-year charts at Yahoo! to see the lack of pegging.</p>
<p>FYI the gist of my argument is that the USDX is worthless for macro prediction, and a broader, trade-weighted index is needed for macro prediction.  While your comment is presenting an economic prediction (that I don&#8217;t necessarily agree with), it actually bolsters my argument that the USDX is worthless in the predictive sphere of things, by your inclusion of some non-USDX countries in your reasoning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2007/10/tale-of-two-dollars/#comment-38519</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2007/10/tale-of-two-dollars/#comment-38519</guid>
		<description>The only flaw in the argument is that Japan, China and others participate are, the very least, loosely pegged  to the dollar by their central Banks.   China, Japan, and most of Asia and some Middle Eastern countries.   I would argue that the dollar is being artificially supported by their Mercantalistic trade policies.   This also may be putting artificial strength in the Euro, as these currencies are kept weaker, the Euro may act as a relief valve.   

As long as these countries maintain this policy, the US dollar will not collapse.   But if they were to ever decide that the stable currecy relationship with the US dollar was no longer in their interests, then, it could be serious.     They currently must feel that it is in their interest to protect the value of their rather large Dollar reserves.    

But further recklessness by the Fed, Congress or the President could lead them to change their views.    Demanding Yuan revaluation, trade sanctions, or protectionist policies that prevent acquisitions of US companies, are among things to fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only flaw in the argument is that Japan, China and others participate are, the very least, loosely pegged  to the dollar by their central Banks.   China, Japan, and most of Asia and some Middle Eastern countries.   I would argue that the dollar is being artificially supported by their Mercantalistic trade policies.   This also may be putting artificial strength in the Euro, as these currencies are kept weaker, the Euro may act as a relief valve.   </p>
<p>As long as these countries maintain this policy, the US dollar will not collapse.   But if they were to ever decide that the stable currecy relationship with the US dollar was no longer in their interests, then, it could be serious.     They currently must feel that it is in their interest to protect the value of their rather large Dollar reserves.    </p>
<p>But further recklessness by the Fed, Congress or the President could lead them to change their views.    Demanding Yuan revaluation, trade sanctions, or protectionist policies that prevent acquisitions of US companies, are among things to fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking Closely at the Dollar Index &#187; The Essentials of Trading</title>
		<link>http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2007/10/tale-of-two-dollars/#comment-38515</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking Closely at the Dollar Index &#187; The Essentials of Trading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.billakanodoodahs.com/2007/10/tale-of-two-dollars/#comment-38515</guid>
		<description>[...] Bill Rempel (NO DooDahs!) posted a great piece on the Dollar Index and how useful it is as any kind of indicator of Dollar strength (or the lack there of). I&#8217;ve been waiting for someone to hit on the reality of the U.S. trade picture, as opposed to the way the USDX is calculated. Bookmark to: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Bill Rempel (NO DooDahs!) posted a great piece on the Dollar Index and how useful it is as any kind of indicator of Dollar strength (or the lack there of). I&#8217;ve been waiting for someone to hit on the reality of the U.S. trade picture, as opposed to the way the USDX is calculated. Bookmark to: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
